Wikipedia reliable source
The short answer is yes, you can . . . but you probably shouldn't. Instead, try to find the original source from where the Wikipedia contributor got their information by looking for in-article citations. If you can find a source, it's a good idea to cite that instead, especially if it's a primary source. If there's no citation, it's time to do ...Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the descriptive label historian to refer to an historian.
Did you know?
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileIf you want another opinion about whether this opinion piece in a podcast blog would be a reliable source, you can post at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, but I would expect to get a similar response. The clear resolution would be to provide any reliable, secondary source for the claim. The second best would be to provide reliable …LLMs do not follow Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and reliable sourcing. LLMs sometimes exclude citations altogether or cite sources that don't meet Wikipedia's reliability standards (including citing Wikipedia as a source). In some case, they hallucinate citations of non-existent references by making up titles, authors, and URLs.
For sources pertaining primarily or specifically to Christian music of all genres, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources . For sources that deal with South Korean culture, including K-pop and other forms of Korean music, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources . For sources that focus on Latin music and its subgenres, see ...Here I’ve compiled a simple list of seven examples of unreliable essay sources which you should avoid referencing at all costs. These are sources that are not credible or reliable sources for essays. 1. Wikipedia. Okay, so here’s the deal. Read Wikipedia. Your friends do, your competitors do, and even your teachers do.Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content. In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication.24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently engaged in a spirited debate over whether Fox News is a reliable enough source to use as a citation in ...
Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Mail. -- Guy Macon ( talk ) 22:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.History. Founded in 1768, The Encyclopedia Britannica is a general knowledge English-language encyclopedia. It is written by about 100 full-time editors and more than 4,000 contributors, including 110 Nobel Prize winners and five American presidents. The 2010 version of the 15th edition, which spans 32 volumes and 32,640 …A source that is official is called authoritative if it is known to be reliable and its authority or authenticity is widely recognized by experts in the field. Libraries specialize in collecting these types of resources so that students and faculty have the tools they need to research effectively. ….
Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Wikipedia reliable source. Possible cause: Not clear wikipedia reliable source.
Wikipedia offers free and reliable information instantly. So why do teachers almost universally distrust it? Wikipedia has community-enforced policies on neutrality, reliability and notability.Use a reliable search tool. Type in the name of the news site into Google search instead of into the address field. This will prevent any typos you may make from pulling up a fake site.Yes, Wikipedia strongly prefers independent, reliable sources as the "Wikipedia:Reliable sources" policy page goes into great detail about. But in certain cases, using the person themselves as a source is fine. In the section "Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves", the policy lists 5 criteria that should …
1.2 Cocotama's Arabic Wikipedia article. 2 comments. 1.3 Interwiki problem. 6 comments. 1.4 HOW TO UPLOAD A PICTURE IN A PAGE. 3 comments. 1.5 Ip adress. 3 comments. 1.6 2019 European Parliament election in France. 3 comments. 1.7 Editing Reflist. 3 comments. 1.8 Restore Amir Ali Shaik Page. 2 comments. 1.9 Is there going to be an end …Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start.Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.
kansas mens basketball coach Sources 70 News A WordPress-hosted site that published a false news story, stating that Donald Trump had won the popular vote in the 2016 United States presidential election; the fake story rose to the top in searches for "final election results" on Google News. ABCnews.com.co (defunct) Owned by Paul Horner. costco pandg promotion 2022u of k basketball schedule Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.Nov 5, 2021 · Wikipedia has community-enforced policies on neutrality, reliability and notability. This means all information "must be presented accurately and without bias"; sources must come from a third ... north wildwood homes for sale zillow It was in production from 1976 to 2008 in Japan and has been in production since 1992 in Pakistan. The CG was originally manufactured in Japan, but the source for the European market was eventually moved to Brazil in 1985, and to Pakistan and Turkey in 1992 for the W and M models.v. t. e. In journalism, a source is a person, publication, or knowledge other record or document that gives timely information. Outside journalism, sources are sometimes known as "news sources". Examples of sources include but are not limited to official records, publications or broadcasts, officials in government or business, organizations or ... popstar set royale highthe clone wars wikipediageorge beal Overview. Wikipedia has articles about every topic you can imagine — from Taylor Swift to “toast sandwiches,” among the online encyclopedia’s 6.6 million articles. But that trove of ... wolverine trencher reviews Yes, Wikipedia strongly prefers independent, reliable sources as the "Wikipedia:Reliable sources" policy page goes into great detail about. But in certain cases, using the person themselves as a source is fine. In the section "Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves", the policy lists 5 criteria that should … lottery usa mikansas bidswhat time does kansas university play tonight According to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ...